Carbon dating earth
MYTH #2 Radiocarbon dating has established the date of some organic materials (e.g., some peat deposits) to be well in excess of 50,000 years, thus rendering a recent creation (6 to 10 thousand years ago) impossible.
Some organic materials do give radiocarbon ages in excess of 50,000 "radiocarbon years." However, it is important to distinguish between "radiocarbon years" and calendar years.
However, geologists know this, and would never try to prove that something is millions of years old based on carbon dating.
The major mistake Hovind makes in this article relates to his claim of equilibrium.
These two measures of time will only be the same if all of the assumptions which go into the conventional radiocarbon dating technique are valid.
The only notable exception is that he says carbon dating is only good for objects less than 40,000 years old. As technologies advance, so does our ability to detect the amount of C-14 in a sample.
The field of radiocarbon dating has become a technical one far removed from the naive simplicity which characterized its initial introduction by Libby in the late 1940's.
It is, therefore, not surprising that many misconceptions about what radiocarbon can or cannot do and what it has or has not shown are prevalent among creationists and evolutionists - lay people as well as scientists not directly involved in this field.
We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods.
Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on Earth.